Porn filter at the center of broadband expansion debate between Senate and Texas House


The almost indisputable bill to extend broadband access to rural areas has a highly controversial element that is the focus of the Legislative Assembly committee, which is tasked with producing the final version.

House Building (HB) 5 It creates a broadband expansion office tasked with granting federal funding to contractors who have agreed to expand Internet access to poorly serviced areas, and was unanimously approved in each conference room. It was. However, the House of Representatives has worked on amendments to prioritize contracts for companies that agree to add porn filters to their services.

Courtesy of Congressman Jeff Carson (Republican-Bedford) Fix “The office … shall prioritize applicants to maintain a program in which the broadband provided by the applicant blocks access to pornography and other obscene materials by default.”

But that language was removed in Senate adoption version..

The porn filter language is the focus of the conference committee’s debate, as it is the most substantive difference between the two versions.

“It was revealed to me that the bill was in a meeting because the Senate decided to remove the default porn filter from the bill,” Kason said. Texan..

“I am very grateful to Congressman Ashby for fighting for the house version and hope that the Senate will understand that our children can be protected by the constitutional regulations of this pornography. I am. “

Proponents of this language have stated that it is a reasonable and necessary precaution to prevent children from accessing online pornography.

Terry Schilling of the American Principles Project (APP) likened the web filter to a basic cable package that doesn’t include adult content streams in its default package. You need to find out the porn channels and access them individually.

“We have physical protection in the real world. We don’t let kids go to physical porn shops and porn theaters, but somehow another standard when the internet came out. Has been applied, “said Schilling. Texan..

And while in physical porn shops consumers have to look for them, Schilling said online vendors find a way to consumers. “With the rise of 4G and 5G, kids are now pocketing the entire porn theater on their smartphones.”

Opponents of Shilling quoted the first amendment, stating that the government has no right to limit what Internet consumers have access to.Breakthrough 1997 US Supreme Court Proceedings Leno vs ACLUThe Court said that the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (a law with a purpose similar to Kason’s words, but much more comprehensive) could not clearly define “vulgar communications” or could tightly adjust the restrictions. Because it wasn’t, we decided that it violated the first amendment.

Schilling and APP have asked members of Nichols and Ashby to call their respective offices and advocate on behalf of the porn filter language. Schilling said he coordinated 500 calls to Nichols’ office and 200 to Ashby’s office in a week.

The broadband bill is not only an overall priority in both houses, but also on the list of Governor Greg Abbott. Urgent items For the legislative assembly.

Neither Senator Nichols nor Senator Ashby returned a request for comment on the story by the time of publication.

Porn filter at the center of broadband expansion debate between Senate and Texas House

Source link Porn filter at the center of broadband expansion debate between Senate and Texas House





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *